opinion I read with interest the submission by some Clergy and Christians in West Ankole Diocese accusing the Archbishop of the Church of the province of Uganda for unlawful takeover of their Diocese . As a mature ordained Christian, well wisher and former provincial Secretary of the Church of the province of Uganda, allow me to state that the Archbishop has the moral and ecclesiastical authority to take over the episcopal jurisdiction of any diocese in the event of a vacancy in a Diocese like West Ankole , in accordance with the Constitution and Canons of the Church of the province of Uganda. Article 9 of the Provincial Constitution 1972 as amended in 1994, gives powers to the Archbishop to exercise general Pastoral care, leadership, supervision and discipline over the whole province. Article 9 authorises him to visit officially any diocese of the province, whether at the invitation of the Bishop or of his own initiative and therefore overseeing west Ankole is not his choice but a Constitutional mandate. Canon 1:3:8 , the Archbishop is mandated to take over a diocese .
“In the event of a vacancy in a diocese as a result of death or illness or other incapacity of this Diocesan Bishop or where a Diocesan Bishop does not hand over the office upon attaining the age of 65 years, the Archbishop shall take over the see until a new Bishop is elected, consecrated and enthroned.” . Bishop Yona Katoneeene retired upon attaining the mandatory retirement age of 65 and did not hand over West Ankole Diocese to another bishop and therefore the matter of West Ankole falls squarely within the provisions of this Canon Christians of the Church of Uganda must understand that the Archbishop has a pastoral relationship and authority over the whole province and is charged with giving leadership in initiating and developing the implementation of decisions of the Provincial Assembly throughout the Church of Uganda . In the case of West Ankole Diocese, Bishop Katonene did officially hand over the Diocese to the Archbishop by October 2, because earlier arrangements to elect the successor bishop had been flawed.
Therefore, appointing a Bishop’s Commissary for West Ankole Diocese was lawful because the Archbishop has the prerogative to delegate any mature, capable men or women of integrity to perform an oversight responsibility for him so long as he gives them proper terms of reference and time lines.
Petitioners from West Ankole, should be made to understand that whenever a Diocesan Bishop abdicates Episcopal jurisdiction, he hands over his Episcopal Pastoral Staff to the Archbishop who hands it to the new bishop, At his enthronement, the Archbishop gives him Episcopal Pastoral Staff as a way of authorising him to perform his duties as a diocesan bishop but on behalf of the Archbishop. As of now the pastoral staff is with the Arcbishop and will remain with him till he hands it over to the new bishop at his consecration and enthronement in essence symbolising that the Episcopal jurisdiction of the Diocese is now vested with the Archbishop In fact, Justice Lydia Mugambe and others have no power to authorise West Ankole Diocesan Secretary Rev Canon Arthur Atwine to take over the Episcopal jurisdiction of the Diocese unless the Archbishop gives it a blessing and authorisation. I advise Rev Canon Atwine not to allow to be dragged into serious ecclesiastical problems because this may jeopardise his future career in…